The political news recently has been hot with Obama's statements about single-issue voters. He said these people vote just based on one issue (gun rights, for example) instead of looking at bigger-picture items like economic policy because they don't trust politicians to follow through with economic promises.
I think he has a good point. But I don't think that's the only or even main reason so many people are single-issue voters. A bigger reason, in my opinion, is that economics, foreign relations, and other "bigger-picture" policies are very complicated.
If you own a gun, or have one in mind, and the government proposes to make that gun illegal, it's a simple decision to oppose it. Move on to which policies will best maintain U.S. influence in the world, however: people who spend their whole lives studying these issues have widely diverging viewpoints. So how is your average voter - who has to work, maintain a household, often be a caretaken for children or disabled relatives, have some sort of social and/or religious life, and, oh yeah, sleep - supposed to come to an informed decision on these issues?
Our politicians and news media try to reduce everything to soundbytes. Maybe single-issue voters realize soundbytes are not a basis for an informed decision, and so only vote on issues where they understand the impact of their vote. Our society has failed to engage these voters.
Wednesday, April 16, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment